Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Human Resource Information System implementation readiness in the Ethiopian health sector: a cross-sectional study

Human Resources for Health201715:85

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-017-0259-3

Received: 9 November 2016

Accepted: 30 November 2017

Published: 20 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Health workforce information systems in low-income countries tend to be defective with poor relationship to information sources. Human Resource Information System (HRIS) is currently in a pilot implementation phase in the Federal Ministry of Health and Regional Health Bureaus of Ethiopia. Before scaling up the implementation, it is important to understand the implementation readiness of hospitals and health departments. The aims of this study were to assess the readiness for HRIS implementation, identify associated factors, and explore the implementation challenges in public hospitals and health departments of the Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia.

Methods

An institution-based cross-sectional study supplemented with a qualitative study was conducted from the 15th of February to the 30th of March 2016 in 19 public hospitals and health departments of the Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. The questionnaire includes items on socio-demographic characteristics and questions measuring technical, personal, and organizational factors adapted from the 32-item questionnaire of the Management Science for Health (MSH) HRIS readiness assessment tool. The data were entered and analyzed with statistical software. Descriptive statistics and bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were computed to identify the factors statistically associated with readiness of HRIS implementation. In-depth interviews and observation checklists were used to collect qualitative data. Thematic content analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data.

Result

A total of 246 human resource (HR) employees and 16 key informants have been included in the study. The HR employee’s level of readiness for HRIS implementation in this study was 35.8%. Employee’s Internet access (AOR = 2.59, 95%CI = 1.19, 5.62), availability of separate HR section (AOR = 8.08, 95%CI = 3.69, 17.70), basic computer skills (AOR = 6.74, 95%CI = 2.75, 16.56), and fear of unemployment (AOR = 2.83, 95%CI = 1.27, 6.32) were associated with readiness of HRIS implementation. Poor logistic supply, lack of competency, poor commitment, and shortage of finance were the challenges of HRIS implementation.

Conclusion

In this study, readiness of HRIS implementation was low. Strategies targeting to improve skills, awareness, and attitude of HR employees would facilitate the implementation process.

Keywords

  • HRIS
  • E-HRM
  • Electronic Human Resource Management
  • Readiness
  • Human Resource Information System
  • Ethiopia

Background

Efficient and effective management of human capital is increasingly becoming very important. As a result, there has been a considerable increase in the number of health institutions gathering, storing, and analyzing information regarding their Human Resources (HR) through the use of Information and Communication Technology [1].

In 2010 WHO (World Health Organization) technical meeting to strengthen health workforce information systems in low-income countries, it was reported that the Human Resource Information System (HRIS) of the low-income countries tend to be defective with poor relationship to other information sources [2]. Poor management of HR for health data, low utilization of HRIS for health policy, and incompetency of employees in handling computerized information systems were the weaknesses reported from low-income countries [2, 3].

HRIS is an efficient and well-organized catalyst for connecting HR management and Information Technology [4]. It is a database system that is developed to provide the necessary support to human resource management (HRM) in terms of collecting and analyzing HR data, decision-making, and reporting of HR information [5, 6]. It is increasingly becoming an integral part of national HR for health performance assessment and a valuable tool for health systems strengthening [7, 8].

To improve the routine manual process, speed up the often slow HRM process, and deal with the transformational changes, implementing HRIS is crucial. The implementation of HRIS has positive impact on the performance of hospitals, health departments, and other healthcare organization [911]. However, its implementation in many low-income countries has been a challenging task. Challenges such as shortage of expertise, technical difficulties, shortage of finance, lack of technically skilled HR, and top management support failures and dedication have lagged the implementation process in many low-income countries [9, 12, 13]. In addition, deficient HR knowledge by system designers, lack of appliances for HR users, lack of competent HRIS employees, failure to work in teams with other departments, and failure of information technology support were identified as challenges [9, 12, 14, 15]. Due to such challenges, low-income countries such as Tanzania took more than 6 years to roll out HRIS and to make it a strong data source for human resource for health (HRH) and social welfare workers in Tanzania [12].

The global review of information systems on HR for health in 2013 reported that Ethiopia is one of the WHO designated HRH crisis country [3, 16]. In Ethiopia, HRIS mainly relies on paper-based system by which the personnel department had to manually collect data from applicants and employees in order to keep employees’ information [17]. Moreover, there is no HRIS and no proper mechanism to manage data about the existing health work force [18, 19]. Hence, the whole process of HR system is tremendously time-consuming, and the core HR processes (such as recruitment and selection) are liable to data discrepancies due to lack of reliable information system in place [17, 19, 20].

In Ethiopia, the main HR functions have been allocated under two separate arms of The Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH): Human Resource Development Directorate, and Health Professionals and Facilities Licensing and Regulation conducted by Food, Medicine and Health Care Administration and Control Authority (FMHACA). Projected estimates show that the HRH requirements in Ethiopia will increase by more than threefold in the coming decades. Therefore, Advanced HRIS is crucial and timely for the efficient management of HR system in Ethiopia [19, 21]. Because of this, in the new Health Sector Growth and Transformation Plan, the Ethiopian FMoH has planned to implement HRIS in health institutions aiming to revolutionize HRH core processes and facilitate health system strengthening [19, 22]. However, the implementation faces challenges and factors that hinder a successful implementation [19, 20, 23]. Due to these challenges, the currently being piloted HRIS is at risk of being abandoned [23].

According to literature, readiness of HRIS implementation is influenced by the demographic characteristics of employees, availability of skilled human power, organizational structure, and technological factors [10, 24, 25]. Evidence from Tanzania suggested that strong involvement of higher officials, reliable technical support for the system users, provision of training, and close follow-up were the key success factors for implementation of HRIS [12]. However, lack of supportive supervision, non-reliable internet connection, insufficient infrastructure, and pre-conceived negative experience of system users are also cited as challenges of implementation [12, 23].

Studying readiness of HRIS implementation is crucial to predict the HRIS success or failure. As system change often causes change resistance, successful change needs to have a common understanding of the objectives among all stakeholders, users, and implementers who have direct relationship with the HRIS implementation [26]. Managers and stakeholders need to use their positive influence to make individuals, groups, and organization exchange the same vision of change. Hence, factors associated with readiness and challenges limiting the implementation need to be studied before the implementation. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) investigate readiness of employees towards HRIS implementation, (2) identify factors associated with implementation readiness, and (3) explore challenges of HRIS implementation among HR employees of the public hospitals and health departments of the Amhara National Regional State.

Methods

An institution-based cross-sectional study triangulated with qualitative study was conducted from the 15th of February to the 30th of March 2016 in Amhara National Regional State in public hospitals and health departments. Amhara National Regional State is one of the nine regional states in Ethiopia and inhabits the second largest population of the country. The source population for this study was HR employees, medical directors, managers of public hospitals, and heads of the zonal and town administration health departments. The study population consists of all HR employees, medical directors, managers, and vice mangers of 19 public hospitals and 10 zonal and 3 town administration health departments in the region. Respondents having more than 3 months of work experience were included in the study. Employees who were in their annual leave and/or sick leave during the data collection period were excluded from the study.

The sample size for this study was determined using a single population proportion formula. Where N = size of the study population, n = sample size, p = proportion of readiness to implement HRIS to 50%, d = desired level/margin of error (5%), z = standard normal distribution curve value for the 95% confidence interval (1.96). Based on the formula, the sample size was calculated to be 166 respondents. We included all the 288 HR employees. To explore the challenges of HRIS implementation, qualitative data were collected using semi-structured in-depth interview and an observation checklist. Following recommendations from qualitative study methodological guidelines [27, 28], we continued the in-depth interviews until level of saturation or to the point where no emergent opinion was reached. Hence, 16 of the 83 managers/vice managers of the hospitals and zonal health departments were included in the in-depth interview.

Data collection procedure and tools

Data were collected from HR employees of health departments using self-administered questionnaires (Additional file 1). In-depth interview and observation checklists were used to collect qualitative data from key informants composed of heads of HR departments, managers, and medical directors of hospitals and zonal health departments. Readiness of HRIS implementation was assessed by adapting the 32-item Management Science for Health HRIS assessment tool [29]. The tool was preferred as it has been validated in developing countries context [15]. We also pretested the tool and found that it is applicable in the Ethiopian context. Factors that could potentially affect the organizational readiness of HRIS implementation were selected from the literature. Finally, an observation checklist was used to supplement the quantitative data. The contents of this checklist include items helpful to observe HR infrastructure such as electric power availability, availability of separate HR sections for HR core processes, fulfillment of the ergonomics of HR, availability of computer and its accessories, and availability of necessary office setups.

The self-administered questionnaire for collecting the quantitative data was first prepared in English, translated to Amharic, local language, and then translated back to English by language experts to check for consistency. The questionnaire which was used to collect data from all respondents was in the local language, Amharic. Ten trained Health Information Technicians (HIT) were assigned to collect the data. The entire data collection process was supervised by two data collection supervisors employed for the study.

Data quality management

Questionnaires were given to the respondents after explaining the purpose of the study and encouraging them to provide genuine responses. Respondents were briefed concisely without losing the perspective of the intended objective of the questionnaire. In addition, the layout was designed to be simple to attract the respondents. A 2-day training on how the date should be collected was given to 10 HIT. Frequent supervisions on the data collection process to ensure the completeness and consistency of the gathered information and errors for example missing values and incomplete questionnaire found during the process were corrected.

Data processing and analysis

The data were entered using EPI info version 3.5.1 software and analyzed using SPSS version 20 statistical package. Data cleaning was performed to check for frequencies, accuracy, and consistencies and missing values and variables. Errors identified were corrected through rechecking each respondent’s questionnaire. Frequencies, proportion, and summary statistics were used to describe the study population in relation to relevant variables. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out to investigate the effect of each independent variable on the dependent variable. Independent variables with P value of less than 0.2 were taken into multivariable logistic regression analysis to control the effect of confounding. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were then used to identify the factors associated with the readiness of HRIS implementation. The qualitative data were analyzed through thematic content analysis.

Readiness of HRIS Implementation was assessed by adapting the 32-item Management Sciences for Health HRIS readiness assessment tool. Those who score above the mean value of the 32 (yes/no)-item questions measuring the technical, organizational, and personal requirements were operationally defined as “ready” else “not ready.”

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study population

A total of 246 human resource employees were included in the study, and the overall response rate was 85.4%. The respondents were working in 32 health organizations, i.e., in 19 public hospitals and 10 zonal and 3 town administrative health departments. Of the total study subjects, 131 (53.3%) were females. The mean age of the study subjects was 34.5 with an SD of 7.3 years, and 128 (52%) of them had first degree and above.

Among the HR employees, 103 (41.9%) of them had a monthly salary from 2351.00 (low) to 3350.00 (middle) Ethiopian birr (1 US$ = 23 Ethiopian birr). Regarding their work experience, 75 (30.5%) had less than 5 years of work experience (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of HR employees in public hospitals and health departments, Amhara Regional state (N = 288)

Variables

Frequency

Percent

Age

 Below 25 years

26

10.6

 26–30 years

64

26.0

 31–35 years

57

23.2

 36–40 years

58

23.6

 Above 41 years

41

16.7

Sex

 Female

131

53.3

 Male

115

46.7

Marital Status

 Single

71

28.9

 Married

157

63.8

 Divorce

16

6.5

 Widowed

2

.8

Religion

 Orthodox

194

78.9

 Muslim

30

12.2

 Protestant

22

8.9

Educational Status

 College diploma and below

118

48.0

 First degree and above

128

52.0

Position

 Data clerk

12

4.9

 HR process owner/manager

18

7.3

 HR case workers/employees

183

74.4

 HIT and others

33

13.4

Enrollment

 Regular program

125

50.8

 Distance learning

110

44.7

 Upgrading/in-service training

8

3.3

 Others

3

1.2

Work experience

 Below 5 years

75

30.5

 6–10 years

72

29.3

 11–15 years

49

19.9

 16–20 years

34

13.8

 21 + years

16

6.5

Monthly salary

 Below 2 350.00

61

24.8

 2 351.00–3 350.00

103

41.9

 Above 3 351.00

82

33.3

A total of 16 key informants participated in the in-depth interview of hospital managers, department heads, and medical directors. Of these, six were hospital managers, four health department heads, four HR department managers, and two medical directors.

Overall readiness of HRIS implementation

Readiness was determined based on whether the value calculated from the total of 32 items analyzed was above or below the mean. Hence, the overall readiness to implement HRIS in Amhara Regional State public hospitals and health departments was 35.8%.

Regarding the infrastructure of the hospitals and health departments, 198 (80.5%) respondents had telephone access in their working organization for office work purpose, and 220 (89.4%) had electric power access. This was also confirmed by the observation made in the hospitals and departments. The majority of the respondents 193 (78.5%) had at least one to three computers in their HR department, one computer being shared among a maximum of 10 HR staffs; in most cases, only one computer is available for one HR core process.

The majority of the respondents, 220 (89.4%), had no personal computer for themselves. Internet and network access were not available for 197 (72.8%) respondents. Regarding their office structure, half of them, 122 (49.6%), had no separate room for HR section. This was also confirmed by the observation made but each of the respondents had their own seats to perform their daily tasks. Eighty-seven percent of the respondents replied that their HR section had no separate budget. Concerning information technology support, 230 (93.5%) reported that they did not have anyone in their organization being qualified to keep the computer(s) functioning and to deal with any malfunctions (Table 2).
Table 2

Organizational factors of the HR employees in public hospitals and health departments, Amhara Regional state (N = 288)

Variable

Frequency

Percentage

Telephone access

 Yes

198

80.5

 No

48

19.5

Electric power

 Yes

220

89.4

 No

26

10.6

Number of computer in HR section

 No computer

12

4.9

 1–3 computers

193

78.5

 4 and above computers

41

16.7

Personal computer

 Yes

26

10.6

 No

220

89.4

Internet access

 Yes

67

27.2

 No

179

72.8

Network access

 Yes

67

27.2

 No

179

72.8

Functional printer access

 Yes

205

83.3

 No

41

16.7

Backup power supply

 Yes

12

4.9

 No

234

95.1

Separate HR section

 Yes

124

50.4

 No

122

49.6

Separate budget allocation for HR section

 Yes

32

13.0

 No

214

87.0

Information technology supporter

 Yes

16

6.5

 No

230

93.5

A respondent at the zonal health department head said: “In zonal and town administration health departments, the HR section and the supply and logistic departments are organized together in one case team. Owing to this, separate budget and technology advancement is not as it was expected. There is no ICT (Information Communication Technology) support and we often have difficulties whenever we need support for computer maintenance and troubleshooting”.

A 36-year-old, male HR manager described the situation

“The HR section is well organized and based on the ‘Kaizen’ principles but each employee has not his/her own personal computer on his/her seats. The only employees who have their own computer on their table are the HR manager and the data clerk-secretaries.”

During the observation sessions of this study, most of hospitals’ and health department’s HR section offices were not well organized. It was observed that they had small and uncomfortable offices. In the observation of the 32 institutions, 17 (53%) had no separate room for the HR section. One HR employee in a hospital said: “HR section is simply seen by executives as a room where incoming and outgoing letters get registered.” He added that: “It needs the attention of executives and professionals with appropriate software training to make the human resource management a technologically supported work area/section.”

Of the total respondents, 173 (70.3%) of them did not think that there is a developed information technology infrastructure in their organization. The respondents were asked whether their computers will be suitable to use HRIS; 80 (32.5%) replied it is adequate. The respondents were also asked whether the HRIS will be user-friendly or not; 104 (42.3%) think that it will be user-friendly. In addition to that, 127 (51.6%) also expect that HRIS software will be compatible with the current HR workflow (Table 3).
Table 3

Technical factors of the HR employees in public hospitals and health departments, Amhara Regional state (N = 288)

Variables/question

Frequency

Percentage

Do you think that there is a developed information technology infrastructure (i.e., hardware, software, networks), and human expertise?

 Yes

73

29.7

 No

173

70.3

Is your computer comfortable to use?

 Yes

80

32.5

 No

166

67.5

Do you use anti-virus for your computer?

 Yes

89

36.2

 No

157

63.8

Do you think that HRIS software will be user friendly?

 Yes

104

42.3

 No

142

57.7

Do you think that HRIS software will be compatible with the HR workflow?

 Yes

127

51.6

 No

119

48.4

A 39-year-old primary hospital manager said: “The HR section is separate and ergonomically is good but the infrastructure (internet, network, per-head personal computers etc.) are not well furnished. In addition to these, employees are not skilled to use computers unless they receive trainings”. A 32-year-old male HR manager of a referral hospital also described “HRIS is a very good system if employees are technically aware of how to run the software from recruitment until the exit of employees in the organization.”

Regarding the perceived knowledge about the HRIS, 154 (62.6%) reported they did not know the modules of HRIS, while 138 (43.9%) did not know the advantages of HRIS. When we analyze the respondents’ basic computer skills, 100 (40.7%) reported they had no skill at all. Regarding the ability to install and configure HRIS, 179 (72.8%) and 195 (79.3%) reported that they could not install neither configure the HRIS. In addition to this, 186 (75.6%) reported that they do not have the skills to manipulate the features of HRIS.

During the observation of HR employees in their practical work area, it was observed that the respondents’ lack basic compute knowledge and skills.

A 41-year-old male hospital manager described, “Most of the employees in human resource management have no basic computer skill and there are only two old version computers. They are not enough for eight HR employees in the section. The HIT who are employed before one year will have great contribution for the future to implement HRIS since they have a generic skill more than the HR employees having only basic skills.”

Regarding their perceived attitude about the importance of HRIS software, the majority of the respondents, 209 (85%), reported they believe HRIS are important. Majority, 207 (84.1%), of the respondents thought that they have a role in the implementation of HRIS in their organization. They were asked about their fear of HRIS creating unemployment; 86 (35%) respondents thought that it would make them lose their jobs.

A 41-year-old male HR manager mentioned that,

“Clearly, those HR employees need to have good perceived attitude about HRIS and it’s important for the effective and efficient work accomplishment of human resource management functions. On the contrary employees may be afraid that they will be fired if their work is to be replaced by computers and done by small number of employees.”

Concerning the respondents’ training on the HRIS utilization, 182 (74%) did not take any training. Of the total participants, 174 (70.7%) reported that there was no introduction of HRIS for all employees in their department. Furthermore, about their responsibility for the full implementation of HRIS; 178 (72.4%) of them answered that they felt responsible. The respondents were also asked whether HRIS will enhance efficiency of HRH for organizations. More than four fifths, 213 (86.6%), responded that it could help enhance HRH efficiency. Also, 185 (75.2%) of the respondents replied that they believed that the HRIS is applicable in their organization (Table 4).
Table 4

Personal factors of the HR employees in public hospitals and health departments, Amhara Regional state (N = 288)

Questions/variables

Frequency

Percentage

Do you know the modules of HRIS?

 Yes

92

37.4

 No

154

62.6

Do you know Advantages of HRIS?

 Yes

108

43.9

 No

138

56.1

Have you basic computer skill?

 Yes

146

59.3

 No

100

40.7

Can you install HRIS software?

 Yes

67

27.2

 No

179

72.8

Can you configure the HRIS software?

 Yes

51

20.7

 No

195

79.3

Can you manipulate all the HRIS modules?

 Yes

60

24.4

 No

186

75.6

Do you think that HRIS is important for your organization?

 Yes

209

85.0

 No

37

15.0

Do you think that you have roles in implementation of HRIS?

 Yes

207

84.1

 No

39

15.9

Did you receive training on HRIS?

 Yes

64

26.0

 No

182

74.0

Is there a manual or handbook on HRIS?

 Yes

76

30.9

 No

170

69.1

Is there a starting of the HRIS for all employees in your department?

 Yes

72

29.3

 No

174

70.7

Do you think that HRIS will create unemployment?

 Yes

86

35.0

 No

160

65.0

Do you feel that you are responsible for full implementation of HRIS?

 Yes

178

72.4

 No

68

27.6

Can HRIS enhance efficiency of HRM in the organization?

213

86.6

 Yes

  

 No

33

13.4

Can HRIS software be fully applicable in your organization?

  

 Yes

185

75.2

 No

61

24.8

Factors associated with readiness of HRIS implementation

Bivariate analysis shows that educational status, work experience, availability of internet access, availability of separate HR section, personal computer, availability of information technology support, basic computer skill, and fear of unemployment were significantly associated with readiness at a P value of less than 0.2.

However, the multivariable logistic regression analysis identified that internet access (AOR = 2.59, 95%CI [1.19, 5.62]), availability of separate HR section (AOR = 8.08, 95%CI [3.67–17.70]), basic computer skill (AOR = 6.74, 95%CI [2.75, 16.56]), and fear of unemployment due to HRIS implementation (AOR = 2.83, 95%CI [1.27–6.32]) were independently associated with readiness of HRIS implementation (Table 5).
Table 5

Factors associated with readiness of HRIS implementation of the HR employees in public hospitals and health departments, Amhara Regional state (N = 288)

S. no.

Variables

Readiness of HRIS implementation

Ready

Not yet ready

COR(95%CI)

AOR(95%CI)

1

Educational status

Diploma and below

48(40.7%)

70(59.3%)

1

1

First degree+

40(31.2%)

88(68.8%)

0.66(0.39–1.12)

0.69(0.33–1.45)

2

Work experience

Below 5 years

34(45.3%)

41(54.7%)

0.83(0.28–2.44)

0.32(0.07–1.43)

6–10 years

26(36.1%)

46(63.9%)

0.57(0.19–1.68)

0.35(0.08–1.51)

11–15 years

13(26.5%)

36(73.5%)

0.36(0.11–1.16)

0.22(0.04–1.05)

16–20 years

7(20.6%)

27(79.4%)

0.26(0.07–0.94)

0.27(0.05–1.42)

21 + years

8(50.0%)

8(50.0%)

1

1

3

Availability of personal computer

Yes

17(65.4%)

9(34.6%)

3.96(1.68–9.33)

2.05(0.69–6.06)

No

71(32.3%)

149(67.7%)

1

1

4

Individual Internet access

Yes

39(58.2%)

28(41.8%)

3.37(2.06–6.64)

2.59(1.19–5.62)*

No

49(27.4%)

130(72.6%)

1

1

5

Separate room /HR section

Yes

66(53.2%)

58(46.8%)

5.17(2.89–9.25)

8.08(3.69–17.70)*

No

22(18.0%)

100(82.0%)

1

1

6

Information technology supporter

Yes

49(81.7%)

11(18.3%)

4.37(1.47–13.03)

3.89(.93–16.24)

No

39(21.0%)

147(79.0%)

1

1

7

Basic computer skill

Yes

76(52.1%)

70(47.9%)

7.96(4.01–15.79)

6.74(2.75–16.56)*

No

12(12.0%)

88(88.0%)

1

1

8

Fear of unemployment?

Yes

27(31.4%)

59(68.6%)

1

1

No

61(38.1%)

99(61.9%)

1.35(0.77–2.35)

2.83(1.27–6.32)*

COR crude odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio, 1 reference

*P value < 0.05

Challenges of readiness of HRIS implementation

The majority of the respondents included in the in-depth interview mentioned the main challenges related to HRIS implementation readiness were first infrastructure related challenges. These challenges include poor logistics and supply, lack of network and internet, low storage capacity and speed of computers, lack of data backup and anti-virus usage, lack of office equipment, low computer accessories availability, and frequent power interruptions.

The second main challenge raised by the respondents was lack of competency or technical skill-related challenges. These challenges were poor computer skills, lack of competent HR employees (skills, knowledge, and attitude), standard data handling skills, and poor information communication skills.

The third challenge explored from the in-depth interviews of this study were related with organizational and managerial challenges such as top management support failure and lack of dedication, failure to work as a team with other departments, low stakeholders’ enthusiasm, low motivation to use information technology, and poor attention to HRIS implementation and HR support process (Fig. 1).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Challenges of readiness of HRIS Implementation

Discussion

This study aimed to determine the readiness of HRIS implementation, identify associated factors, and explore the challenges of HRIS implementation in hospitals and health departments of the Amhara National Regional State.

In this study, the readiness of HRIS implementation was found to be low. The multivariable logistic regression analysis identified that employees internet access, having separate HR section basic computer skills, and fear of unemployment due to HRIS implementation were found to be significantly associated with the readiness of HRIS implementation.

Employees who had internet and network access are 2.59 times more likely to be ready for the implementation of HRIS. A study in Tanzania also reported non-reliable internet connection as one of the problems in successful implementation of HRIS [12]. Besides this, a survey conducted in Bangladesh and a cross-sectional study from Pakistan indicated lack of information technology support as the main challenge in managing HRIS [9, 30]. However, how the availability of internet in their offices make respondents to be ready for change (in this case, HRIS implementation) needs further exploration.

This study shows that half of the respondents had no separate room for HR section. Employees having separate HR room were eight times more likely to be ready to implement HRIS than those employees who had no separate room. Similarly, a theoretical analysis in Malaysia on adoption of HRIS reported that organizational HR section size was one of the factors for successful adoption of HRIS [31]. This might be due to the reason that having no HR section affects the privacy of employees. A study from Bangladesh reported that lack of privacy was impeding the implementation of HRIS [9].

The current study shows that 40.7% of the respondents had no basic computer skills. Those respondents who had basic computer skills were 6.74 times more likely to be ready to the implementation of HRIS than those having no basic computer skills. A Tanzania study revealed computer skill was improved through training on data utilization (secondary uses of information). In addition, training on data visualization was a necessary factor for successful HRIS implementation. This might be due to the reason that training improves as computer skills among system users which ultimately affects readiness for HRIS implementation [12]. A study conducted in India also indicated that HRIS software training is a key determinant of successful HRIS implementation. This is due to the reason that training enhances HR employees’ skills on the use and installation of user-friendly systems [32].

From all respondents, 35% of them fear that the HRIS will create unemployment and risk their job security. This finding is similar with the study from Bangladesh that shows 40% believed that implementation of HRIS would create an unemployment problem [9]. This might be due to the employees’ perception that if their work is supported by a software, only small number of employees would consequently be required. Those respondents having no fear of unemployment were 2.8 times more likely to be ready for the implementation of HRIS. This may be due to the reason that those employees who do not have unemployment concerns are confident on their skills and ready for change [33]. However, whether having no fear of unemployment is related with HRIS adoption obviously requires further research.

This study also explored shortage of finance, lack of competency, and poor stakeholders’ commitment as challenges of HRIS implementation. Similar to this, a study on HRIS implementation from Jordan shows insufficient capital and skills, shortage of money, and top management support failures and dedication as implementation challenges [13].

Our study has limitations particularly due to social desirability bias that possibly be introduced from respondents of the in-depth interviews. In addition, the respondents of the self-administered questionnaire might have a social desirability bias in self-reporting on the questionnaire. However, we have not observed significant differences between the responses retrieved from observation checklist and from the self-reported questionnaire.

Conclusion

The readiness of HRIS implementation was found to be low. The availability of internet access, having separate HR section, having basic computer skills, and having no fear of unemployment due to HRIS implementation were positively associated with readiness of HRIS implementation. Poor logistic and supply, lack of competency, poor stakeholders’ commitment, and shortage of finance were the challenges of HRIS implementation. Providing basic computer skills training for HR employees, managers, and executives of hospitals and health departments; providing reliable internet access; and separate HR section would facilitate the successful implementation of HRIS.

Abbreviations

eHR: 

electronic Human Resource

FMOH: 

Federal Ministry of Health

HIT: 

Health Information Technician

HR: 

Human Resource

HRH: 

Human Resources for Health

HRIS: 

Human Resource Information System

HRM: 

Human Resource Management

WHO: 

World Health organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We sincerely express our gratitude to the University of Gondar, JHIPEGO, and Debere Berhan Health Science College for their financial support to conduct this research project. We would also like to thank the Department of Health Service Management, University of Gondar, for facilitating the timely completion of this research project.

Funding

The data collection process of this study was funded by the University of Gondar, Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics (JHIPEGO), and Debere Berhan Health Science College. The funding bodies had no involvement in the design, data collection analysis, write-up, and decision for the results to be published. They only followed the process to confirm whether the fund allocated was used for the proposed research and planned objective.

Availability of data and materials

The data collected for this study can be obtained from the first or last author upon a reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

ED developed the study, was involved in the study proposal writing, designed the study, was responsible for data collection, analyzed the data, drafted the first version of manuscript, and participated in all phases of the project. MG contributed in the design and interpretation of the data and the results and had substantial contribution in critically revising the first draft of the manuscript. MK had substantial contribution in the design and interpretation of the data and the results, was involved in the drafting and critical revising of the manuscript, revised the manuscript upon receipt of reviewers’ comments, and had given final approval for the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript before submission.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institution Review Board of the Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar. Permission was obtained from the management of each hospital and health department included in the study. Brief explanation has been given to all respondents about the purpose of the study, and the privacy of their responses during data collection was maintained. Verbal consent was received from each respondent before the data collection. It was clearly stated that their response was only for research purpose, and the data collected were kept confidential.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Service Management, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
(2)
Department of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
(3)
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS , Bremen, Germany

References

  1. Shiri S. Effectiveness of Human Resource Information System on HR functions of the organization, a cross sectional study. US-China Education Review. 2012:830–9.Google Scholar
  2. WHO: Report of the first meeting of the health workforce information reference group. 2010.Google Scholar
  3. Riley PL, Zuber A, Vindigni SM, Gupta N, Verani AR, Sunderland NL, Friedman M, Zurn P, Okoro C, Patrick H. Information systems on human resources for health: a global review. Hum Resour Health. 2012;10(1):7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bal Y, Bozkurt S, Ertemsir E: The importance of using human resources information systems (HRIS) and a research on determining the success of HRIS. 2012.Google Scholar
  5. Kabene SM, Orchard C, Howard JM, Soriano MA, Leduc R. The importance of human resources management in health care: a global context. Hum Resour Health. 2006;4:20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. D Dorel, A Bradic-Martinovic: The role of information systems in human resource management. Published in: Research monograph on the role of labour markets and human capital in the unstable environment. Research monograph on the role of labour markets and human Capital in the Unstable Environment 2011.Google Scholar
  7. WHO. Everybody's business - strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO's framework for action. Geneva, Switzerland; 2007. Available from http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43918. Accessed 7 Dec 2017.
  8. Organization WH: Toolkit on monitoring health systems strengthening. WHO 2008b WHO 2009:17–13.Google Scholar
  9. Batool SQ, Sajid DMA, Raza DSH. Benefits and barriers to the implementation of Human Resource Information Systems, Bangladesh. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2012;2(3):211–17.Google Scholar
  10. Pant S, Chatterjee A: e-HR systems implementation: a conceptual framework. Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS) 2008.Google Scholar
  11. Spero JC, McQuide PA, Matte R. Tracking and monitoring the health workforce: a new human resources information system (HRIS) in Uganda. Hum Resour Health. 2011;9:6–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishijima H, Mapunda M, Mndeme M, Sukums F, Mlay VS. Challenges and opportunities for effective adoption of HRH information systems in developing countries: national rollout of HRHIS and TIIS in Tanzania. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Altarawneh I. Human Resource Information Systems in Jordanian Universities. International Journal of Business and Management. 2010;5(10):113–27.Google Scholar
  14. Banerji SC. A study of issues & challenges of implementation of information technology in HRM. Global Journal of Management and Business Studies. 2013;3(4):435–40.Google Scholar
  15. Kumar R, Shaikh BT, Ahmed J, Khan Z, Mursalin S, Memon MI, Zareen S. The Human Resource Information System: a rapid appraisal of Pakistan’s capacity to employ the tool. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2013;13(1):104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Truth AU: No health without a workforce. World Health Organisation (WHO) report 2013.Google Scholar
  17. Federal Ministry of Health. Developing multiple, integrated strategies to address Ethiopia’s human resources for health needs. Geneva, Switzerland; 2007. Available from http://www.who.int/workforcealliance/forum/2011/hrhawardscs24/en/. Accessed 7 Dec 2017.
  18. Girma S, Yohannes A, Kitaw Y, Ye-Ebiyo Y, Seyoum A, Desta H, Teklehaimanot A. Human resource development for health in Ethiopia: challenges of achieving the millennium development goals. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2007;21(3):216–31.Google Scholar
  19. Geresu T, Shiferaw M, Mitike G, Mariam DH. Commentary: a brief review of the draft human resources for health strategic plan, Ethiopia; 2009-2020. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2013;27(1):41–8.Google Scholar
  20. Mengesha T: Electronic solutions for Ethiopian health sector. 2011.Google Scholar
  21. (FMoH) FMoH: Human resource for health information system, Tulane International—Ethiopia 12015.Google Scholar
  22. (FMoH) FMoH. Developing multiple, integratedstrategies to address Ethiopia’s human resources for health needs. In: Second global forum on human resources for health. Bangkok, Thailand: WHO; 2011.Google Scholar
  23. Campbell J, Settle D. Ethiopia: taking forward action on human resources for health (HRH) with DFID/OGAC and other partners. Chapel Hill, NC: Capacity Project, ICS Integrare; 2009.Google Scholar
  24. Bondarouk T, Ruel HJM. Electronic human resource management: challenges in the digital era. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2009;20(3):505–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Nivlouei FB. Electronic human resource management system: the main element in capacitating globalization paradigm. Int J Bus Soc Sci. 2014;5(2)Google Scholar
  26. Heeks R. Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. Int J Med Inform. 2006:125–37.Google Scholar
  27. Fusch PI, Ness LR. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qual Rep. 2015;20(9):1408.Google Scholar
  28. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. MSH. HRM rapid assessment tool for health organizations—3RD edition. Cambridge, MA 02139–4613: Management Sciences for Health; 2012.Google Scholar
  30. Kumar R, Shaikh BT, Ahmed J, Khan Z, Mursalin S, Memon MI, Zareen S. The Human Resource Information System: a rapid appraisal of Pakistan’s capacity to employ the tool. MC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2013;13(104):1–6.Google Scholar
  31. Chakraborty AR, Mansor NNA. Adoption of Human Resource Information System: a theoretical analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;75:473–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Krishnan SK, Singh M. Issues and concerns in the implementation and maintenance of HRIS. Management and Labour Studies. 2007;32(4):522–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiblen S, Grant D, Dery K. Transitioning to a new HRIS: the reshaping of human resources and information technology talent. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 2010;11(4):251.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement