You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: What will make a difference? Assessing the impact of policy and non-policy scenarios on estimations of the future GP workforce

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michel Landry
1 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lud Van Der Velden
29 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mario Lopes
24 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Caroline O Laurence
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michel Landry
4 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lud Van Der Velden
27 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Caroline O Laurence
Resubmission - Version 3
27 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lud Van Der Velden
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12960-017-0216-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement