You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Access to non-pecuniary benefits: does gender matter? Evidence from six low- and middle-income countries

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marko Vujicic
4 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Asha George
20 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bolaji Fapohunda
7 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Neeru Gupta
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marko Vujicic
20 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Asha George
21 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Neeru Gupta
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bolaji Fapohunda
3 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Neeru Gupta
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Neeru Gupta
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
18 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Neeru Gupta
Resubmission - Version 8
18 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
19 Oct 2011 Editorially accepted
19 Oct 2011 Article published 10.1186/1478-4491-9-25

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement